Considering a move off the rig

Thinking about shifting from wellsite to an office subsurface role after this winter’s campaign. I’ve been leaning hard on sedimentary analysis — real-time facies/stacking picks from cuttings and LWD GR-RES, quicklook porosity and net pay to bracket phi-h and NTG — and on 12 wells this year we framed P50 volumes by TD that influenced choke strategy; for those who made this jump, do hiring managers value that fast resource estimation mindset or expect heavier petrophysics/modeling chops up front?

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍⁠⁠‌⁠‌‌‌‍‌⁠‌‍‍​‌‍⁠‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​⁠‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠‌⁠‌‌⁠⁠‌⁠‌​‌‍⁠⁠‌⁠​​‌‍‍‌‌‍​⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠‌⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‌​⁠​‌​⁠​‌​⁠​​​⁠‌‍​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‌‌​‍‍‌‍⁠‍​⁠​‌‌‍⁠​‌‌‍‍‌‍​‍‌⁠​⁠‌⁠‍‍​‍⁠‌‌​‍‍‌⁠‍​‌​‍​‌‍‍​‌​⁠‍‌‌⁠⁠​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌​​

Made that jump last year. > who made this jump, do hiring managers value that fast resource estimation mindset or expect heavier petrophysics/modeling chops up front? They liked the fast framing, but only once I showed it reproducible in a lightweight petrophysics workflow. Bring a one-pager translating your rig-time phi-h/NTG into a quick Techlog-or-Excel deck with one log tie and a tiny sensitivity; that sold it, though they still grilled me on Archie and clay corrections.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍⁠⁠‌⁠‌‌‌‍‌⁠‌‍‍​‌‍⁠‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​⁠‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​‌​⁠​‌​⁠​⁠​⁠​​​⁠​​​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‌​⁠​‌​⁠​‌​⁠​​​⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍‌​‌​‍‍‌‍‌⁠​⁠​‍‌​​‍​⁠​⁠‌⁠​‍‌‌‍‌‌‌‌‌​⁠‌‍‌⁠‍‌‌​‍​​⁠‌‍​⁠‌⁠‌‌​‌‌‍​‍​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌